Cliff's profilePolitics, Genealogy, Com...PhotosBlogListsMore Tools Help

Blog


    June 25

    Talking about YouTube - Obama Budget Cuts Visualization

     

    Quote

    YouTube - Obama Budget Cuts Visualization
      
    June 17

    Reprint from Glenn Beck Website

    Reprinted from Glenn Beck’s Website,

    http://www.glennbeck.com/

    Open letter to Barack Obama;

    Well, these are briefly my views and issues for which I seek representation:

    One, illegal immigration. I want you to stop coddling illegal immigrants and secure our borders. Close the underground tunnels. Stop the violence and the trafficking in drugs and people. No amnesty, not again. Been there, done that, no resolution. P.S., I'm not a racist. This isn't to be confused with legal immigration.

    Two, the TARP bill, I want it repealed and I want no further funding supplied to it. We told you no, but you did it anyway. I want the remaining unfunded 95% repealed. Freeze, repeal.

    Three: Czars, I want the circumvention of our checks and balances stopped immediately. Fire the czars. No more czars. Government officials answer to the process, not to the president. Stop trampling on our Constitution and honor it.

    Four, cap and trade. The debate on global warming is not over. There is more to say.

    Five, universal healthcare. I will not be rushed into another expensive decision. Don't you dare try to pass this in the middle of the night and then go on break. Slow down!

    Six, growing government control. I want states rights and sovereignty fully restored. I want less government in my life, not more. Shrink it down. Mind your own business. You have enough to take care of with your real obligations. Why don't you start there.

    Seven, ACORN. I do not want ACORN and its affiliates in charge of our 2010 census. I want them investigated. I also do not want mandatory escrow fees contributed to them every time on every real estate deal that closes. Stop the funding to ACORN and its affiliates pending impartial audits and investigations. I do not trust them with taking the census over with our taxpayer money. I don't trust them with our taxpayer money. Face up to the allegations against them and get it resolved before taxpayers get any more involved with them. If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, hello. Stop protecting your political buddies. You work for us, the people. Investigate.

    Eight, redistribution of wealth. No, no, no. I work for my money. It is mine. I have always worked for people with more money than I have because they gave me jobs. That is the only redistribution of wealth that I will support. I never got a job from a poor person. Why do you want me to hate my employers? Why ‑‑ what do you have against shareholders making a profit?

    Nine, charitable contributions. Although I never got a job from a poor person, I have helped many in need. Charity belongs in our local communities, where we know our needs best and can use our local talent and our local resources. Butt out, please. We want to do it ourselves.

    Ten, corporate bailouts. Knock it off. Sink or swim like the rest of us. If there are hard times ahead, we'll be better off just getting into it and letting the strong survive. Quick and painful. Have you ever ripped off a Band‑Aid? We will pull together. Great things happen in America under great hardship. Give us the chance to innovate. We cannot disappoint you more than you have disappointed us.

    Eleven, transparency and accountability. How about it? No, really, how about it? Let's have it. Let's say we give the buzzwords a rest and have some straight honest talk. Please try ‑‑ please stop manipulating and trying to appease me with clever wording. I am not the idiot you obviously take me for. Stop sneaking around and meeting in back rooms making deals with your friends. It will only be a prelude to your criminal investigation. Stop hiding things from me.

    Twelve, unprecedented quick spending. Stop it now.
    Take a breath. Listen to the people. Let's just slow down and get some input from some nonpoliticians on the subject. Stop making everything an emergency. Stop speed reading our bills into law.

    I am not an activist. I am not a community organizer. Nor am I a terrorist, a militant or a violent person. I am a parent and a grandparent. I work. I'm busy. I'm busy. I am busy, and I am tired. I thought we elected competent people to take care of the business of government so that we could work, raise our families, pay our bills, have a little recreation, complain about taxes, endure our hardships, pursue our personal goals, cut our lawn, wash our cars on the weekends and be responsible contributing members of society and teach our children to be the same all while living in the home of the free and land of the brave.

    I entrusted you with upholding the Constitution. I believed in the checks and balances to keep from getting far off course. What happened? You are very far off course. Do you really think I find humor in the hiring of a speed reader to unintelligently ramble all through a bill that you signed into law without knowing what it contained? I do not. It is a mockery of the responsibility I have entrusted to you. It is a slap in the face. I am not laughing at your arrogance. Why is it that I feel as if you would not trust me to make a single decision about my own life and how I would live it but you should expect that I should trust you with the debt that you have laid on all of us and our children. We did not want the TARP bill. We said no. We would repeal it if we could. I am sure that we still cannot. There is such urgency and recklessness in all of the recent spending.

    From my perspective, it seems that all of you have gone insane. I also know that I am far from alone in these feelings. Do you honestly feel that your current pursuits have merit to patriotic Americans? We want it to stop. We want to put the brakes on everything that is being rushed by us and forced upon us. We want our voice back. You have forced us to put our lives on hold to straighten out the mess that you are making. We will have to give up our vacations, our time spent with our children, any relaxation time we may have had and money we cannot afford to spend on you to bring our concerns to Washington. Our president often knows all the right buzzword is unsustainable. Well, no kidding. How many tens of thousands of dollars did the focus group cost to come up with that word? We don't want your overpriced words. Stop treating us like we're morons.

    We want all of you to stop focusing on your reelection and do the job we want done, not the job you want done or the job your party wants done. You work for us and at this rate I guarantee you not for long because we are coming. We will be heard and we will be represented. You think we're so busy with our lives that we will never come for you? We are the formerly silent majority, all of us who quietly work , pay taxes, obey the law, vote, save money, keep our noses to the grindstone and we are now looking up at you. You have awakened us, the patriotic spirit so strong and so powerful that it had been sleeping too long. You have pushed us too far. Our numbers are great. They may surprise you. For every one of us who will be there, there will be hundreds more that could not come. Unlike you, we have their trust. We will represent them honestly, rest assured. They will be at the polls on voting day to usher you out of office. We have cancelled vacations. We will use our last few dollars saved. We will find the representation among us and a grassroots campaign will flourish. We didn't ask for this fight. But the gloves are coming off. We do not come in violence, but we are angry. You will represent us or you will be replaced with someone who will. There are candidates among us when he will rise like a Phoenix from the ashes that you have made of our constitution.
    Democrat, Republican, independent, libertarian. Understand this. We don't care. Political parties are meaningless to us. Patriotic Americans are willing to do right by us and our Constitution and that is all that matters to us now. We are going to fire all of you who abuse power and seek more. It is not your power. It is ours and we want it back. We entrusted you with it and you abused it. You are dishonorable. You are dishonest. As Americans we are ashamed of you. You have brought shame to us. If you are not representing the wants and needs of your constituency loudly and consistently, in spite of the objections of your party, you will be fired. Did you hear? We no longer care about your political parties. You need to be loyal to us, not to them. Because we will get you fired and they will not save you. If you do or can represent me, my issues, my views, please stand up. Make your identity known. You need to make some noise about it. Speak up. I need to know who you are. If you do not speak up, you will be herded out with the rest of the sheep and we will replace the whole damn congress if need be one by one.

    We are coming. Are we coming for you? Who do you represent? What do you represent? Listen. Because we are coming. We the people are coming.

    This Letter says it better than I could and I thought I would share it in case you haven’t seen it!

    May 26

    New Post on Freedom and the Constitution

    Tuesday, May 26, 2009

    SUPPORT THE 10TH AMENDMENT AND STATES RIGHTS!

    The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.-- U.S. Constitution, Tenth Amendment


    Fed up with Washington's involvement in everything from land use to gun control to education spending, states across the country are fighting back against what they say is the federal government's growing intrusion on their rights.

    At least 35 states have introduced legislation this year asserting their power under the Tenth Amendment to regulate all matters not specifically delegated to the federal government by the Constitution.

    "This has been boiling for years, and it's finally come to a head," said Utah State Rep. Carl Wimmer. "With TARP and No Child Left Behind, these things that continue to give the federal government more authority, our rights as states and individuals are being turned on their head."
    The power struggle between the states and Washington has cropped up periodically ever since the country was founded.
    But now some states are sending a simple, forceful message:
    The government has gone too far!

    ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!


    Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer recently signed into law a bill authorizing the state's gun manufacturers to produce "Made in Montana" firearms, without seeking licensing from the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. Similar laws are being considered in Utah, Alaska, Texas and Tennessee.

    The Montana law is expected to end up in the courts, where states' rights activists hope judges will uphold their constitutional right to regulate firearms. That would reverse a longstanding trend, said Martin Flaherty, a professor of constitutional law at Fordham Law School.


    "From 1937 to 1995 there is not one instance of the Supreme Court knocking back Congress," he said. "In the Constitution the interstate commerce clause gives Congress the right to regulate commerce between the states. That gives them a lot of power. There were questions of how far they can reach, but then comes the New Deal, and Roosevelt gets all these picks on the [Supreme] Court, and they come upon a theory whereupon congressional power is almost infinite."


    That 1930s understanding of the Constitution is now the norm, with advocates for the federal government arguing that issues of a certain size and scope can be addressed only by an institution with the resources of the federal government. As an example, federal authority is necessary in the economic crisis, said U.S. Rep. Dan Boren, whose home state of Oklahoma recently passed a sovereignty resolution. "The economic situation in our nation over the past year has not been contained in any one community or state. The industries and institutions affected by the recent economic crisis touch multiple layers of our economy and are not confined to any one state or region," he said in a statement. "I feel there was Constitutional justification for Congress's recent efforts to stabilize our economy."

    But for many state leaders, the degree to which Congress regulates issues within their boundaries, using the interstate commerce clause to regulate just about everything and anything, has become untenable.

    Texas Gov. Rick Perry made headlines recently when he made a passing reference to the possibility of the Lone Star State seceding from the U.S., saying, "if Washington continues to thumb their nose at the American people, you know, who knows what might come out of that?"

    States rights advocates offer countless examples of what they believe is Washington's overreach.

     

    In Utah, 67 percent of the state's land is controlled by the federal government through wilderness preserves, limiting state leaders in their bid to fill government coffers through oil and natural gas drilling after Interior Secretary Ken Salazar cancelled 103,000 acres of leases this year.


    In Idaho, ranchers are furious that federal endangered species law prevents them from shooting the wolves that prey on their cattle.


    "The balance of power between the states and the federal government is way out of whack," said Georgia state Senator Chip Pearson." The effect here is incalculable. Everything you do from the moment you wake up until you get to bed, there is some federal law or restriction."


    Up until recently, the state sovereignty movement has remained almost entirely Republican, drawing supporters from the ranks that voted against President Obama and attended tea parties last month to protest federal tax hikes. But the movement's rank and file are just as likely now to criticize Obama's predecessor, George W. Bush, as they are the new president, pointing to what they believe were Bush's overreaching policies on education and homeland security.


    Many are becoming frequent visitors to a Web site, http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/, which was founded in early 2007 and has become a community bulletin board for states rights activists and politicians. Up to 20,000 viewers log on to the site every day. The site's founder, Michael Boldin, a 36-year-old Web marketer in Los Angeles who says he has no political affiliation, says he decided to launch the site after watching the Maine State Legislature fight the Department of Homeland Security on the Real ID act, a controversial Bush-era law that will require states to issue federally regulated identification cards, complete with biometric data and stringent address checks. "Maine resisted, and the government backed off, and soon all these other states were doing the same thing," Boldin said.

    "The bottom line is, if there's widespread support, people can resist the federal government at the state level." The deadline for states to comply with Real ID has now been pushed back until 2011.

    The Tenth Amendment movement is not without controversy. In Georgia, a columnist for The Atlanta Journal Constitution called a sovereignty resolution in the state Senate a threat "to secede from and even disband the United States."


    The resolution, which was passed as part of a group of bills that were banded together, affirmed the state's powers under the Tenth Amendment, taking its inspiration and language from Thomas Jefferson's 1798 resolution opposing the Alien and Sedition Acts -- laws enacted by the federal government during wartime to quiet protest against the government.
    The resolution asserts that any instance of the federal government taking action beyond its enumerated powers "shall constitute a nullification of the Constitution for the United States of America by the government of the United States of America."

    "It's been taken out of context by some editors," said Pearson, who sponsored the bill. "It certainly never meant secession. The intent was to communicate that the actions of the federal government are an infringement on states' rights."


    Robert Natelson, a law professor at the University of Montana who was involved in drawing up that state's sovereignty resolution over a decade ago, argues that states up until now have been unwilling to take action of any real consequence in checking federal power. He said, "Back then they passed the resolution, but they didn't turn down any federal dollars."

    He also said. "If the states are serious about returning the federal government to its historical origins, they're going to have to do more than pass resolutions. They're going to have to turn down money and litigate."


    SUPPORT YOUR STATE IN

    REGAINING

    YOUR RIGHTS!!!

    .

    Monday, May 25, 2009

    May 14

    THOMAS PAINE LIVES!!!

    THE REPUBLIC IS IN DANGER!
     
    WATCH AND LISTEN TO THE FOLLOWING VIDEO.
     
      
     
    WHAT IF THOMAS PAINE WERE ALIVE TODAY! WHAT WOULD HE THINK OF THE CURRENT COURSE OF OUR NATION?
    We have drifted from the original meaning of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. WE have ALLOWED Interpretation of what the word "NO" means.
     
    As ex president Clinton said, "it depends on what the meaning of is...is"
     
    To me "MAKE NO LAW" means exactly that. That term is shown several times in the Constitution under which we live, yet it has been interpreted to mean over regulation and over taxation.
     
    YOUR "INALIENABLE RIGHTS" ARE UNDER ASSAULT. Our government is falling from within and so is our culture that is based on the fundamental principles voiced by Thomas Paine, Jefferson, Adams, Washington and the FOUNDERS OF OUR COUNTRY.
    May 13

    COMEDY VIDEO ABOUT THE ECONOMY

     

    NEW POST ON FREEDOM AND THE CONSTITUTION BLOG

     

    http://tinyurl.com/q9v4km

     

    HOPE YOU DON'T MISS THE POINT OF THIS ALTHOUGH FUNNY!

    May 11

    INTIMIDATION BY OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

    NEW POST ON FREEDOM AND THE CONSTITUTION
     
    http://tinyurl.com/oxpfvy
    May 08

    Multiculturism .... A few thoughts!

    Multiculturism as being "pushed" in today's society can only lead to the demise of our American Culture.
     
    The Illegal Immigration isssue must be solved.
     
    Multiculturism must be limited or stopped.
     
    English must become the official languare of the United States!
     
    Legal Immigrants must read, write, and speak English before entrance is granted to the United States!
     
    Legal Immigrants must assimilate and not retain their "old country" values and must become a citizen within 2 years of entry.
     
    Stop requiring Colleges and Universities to teach Multiculturism.
     
    All government communications must be in English only.
     
    No more press 1 for English......Engligh only on phone answering machines!
     
    Wathch this ALARMING Video; 
     
    April 26

    Windows Utility Process Explorer

    There is a Windows Utility Program that is not installed by Windows Automatically that you may want to get.  It is Process Explorer, download at http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896653.aspx .  I have found it expecially useful when I am having problems with my PC, especially when CPU Usage goes to 100 percent.  You can use it to identify which process running is using your resources and react accordingly.  You can set priorities for processes also. 
     
    Not for a Novice, intermediate to advance users.
     
    Links to articles are http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/what-is-svchostexe-and-why-is-it-running/ and http://download.cnet.com/8301-2007_4-9865052-12.html .  Do not download from Cnet.  Download the latest version from Microsoft http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896653.aspx .  This is a zip file.  Extract to your System32 folder, create a shortcut and place the shortcut in your quicklinks menu or programs menu on the desktop.
     
    Highly Recommended!!
    April 14

    Discuss the Constitution

    My Blog "Freedom and The Constitution" at http://cliff-freedomtheconstitution.blogspot.com/, is for discussing the Constitution and how it relates to today.
    I post one section every day, and hope that will spark discussion.
     
    Visit and Post your comments.
     
    Cliff
    April 03

    SECOND AMENDMENT STORY..IT COULD HAPPEN HERE!

     It  is now closer to reality than you think. You're sound asleep when
      you hear a thump outside your bedroom door. Half-awake, and nearly   
      paralyzed with fear, you hear muffled whispers. At least two  people have 
      broken into your house and are moving your way. With  your heart pumping, 
      you reach down beside your bed and pick up  your shotgun. You rack a 
      shell into the chamber, then inch toward  the door and open it. In the darkness,
     you make out two shadows.   One  holds something that looks like a crowbar.
      When the intruder brandishes it as if to strike, you raise the shotgun and fire. The blast 
      knocks both thugs to the floor. One writhes and screams  while the second man crawls
      to the front door and lurches outside.  As you pick up the telephone to call police, 
      you know you're in  trouble.  In  your country, most guns were outlawed years before, 
      and the few that are privately owned are so stringently regulated as to make them    
      useless. Yours was never registered. Police arrive and inform  you that   
      the second burglar has died. They arrest you for First  Degree Murder
      and Illegal Possession of a Firearm. When you talk  to your attorney, he 
      tells you not to worry: authorities will  probably plea the case down to  manslaughter.                                                                                             
      "What  kind of sentence will I get?" you ask.                      
      "Only  ten-to-twelve years," he replies, as if that's nothing.
      "Behave yourself, and you'll be out in seven."                     
      The  next day, the shooting is the lead story in the local newspaper.
      Somehow, you're portrayed as an eccentric vigilante while the two men    
      you shot are represented as choirboys. Their friends and  relatives can't 
      find an unkind word to say about them. Buried deep  down in the article,  
      authorities acknowledge that both "victims"  have been arrested numerous  
      times. But the next day's headline  says it all: "Lovable Rogue Son 
      Didn't Deserve to Die." The  thieves have been transformed from career    
      criminals into Robin  Hood-type pranksters. As the days wear on, the 
      story takes wings.  The national media picks it up, then the  international media. 
      The  surviving burglar has become a folk HERO!
      Your  attorney says the thief is preparing to sue you, and he'll     
      probably win. The media publishes reports that your home has been    
      burglarized several times in the past and that you've been  critical
      of local police for their lack of effort in apprehending  the suspects. 
      After the last break-in, you told your neighbor that  you would be   
      prepared next time. The District Attorney uses this  to allege that you   
      were lying in wait for the burglars.                                                                            
      A  few months later, you go to trial. The charges haven't been 
      reduced, as your lawyer had so confidently predicted. When you  take the
      stand, your anger at the injustice of it all works  against you. Prosecutors
      paint a picture of you as a mean,  vengeful man. It doesn't take long for 
      the jury to convict you of  all charges.                                                                                    
      The  judge sentences you to life in prison.                                                                         
                                            
      This  case really happened.                                                       
        
      On  August 22, 1999, Tony Martin of Emneth, Norfolk,  England, killed one 
      burglar and wounded a second. In April, 2000, he was convicted and is    
      now serving a life term.                                      
     
      How  did it become a crime to defend one's own life in the once Great  British Empire?                                                  
      It  started with the Pistols Act of 1903. This seemingly reasonable law  
      forbade selling pistols to minors or felons and established  that  handgun 
      sales were to be made only to those who had a  license. The Firearms
      Act of 1920 expanded licensing to include  not only handguns but all
      firearms except shotguns.  Later  laws passed in 1953 and 1967 outlawed the carrying of any
      weapon  by private citizens and mandated the registration of all shotguns.
      Momentum  for total handgun confiscation began in earnest after the  
      Hungerford mass shooting in 1987. Michael Ryan, a mentally  disturbed Man 
      with a Kalashnikov rifle, walked down the streets  shooting everyone he   
      saw. When the smoke cleared, 17 people were  dead.            
      The  British public, already de-sensitized by eighty years of "gun   
      control", demanded even tougher restrictions. (The seizure of all privately 
      owned handguns was the objective even though Ryan used a rifle.)                                                      
      Nine  years later, at Dunblane, Scotland, Thomas  Hamilton used a   
      semi-automatic weapon to murder 16 children and a  teacher at a public school.                                                         
      For  many years, the media had portrayed all gun owners as mentally  
      unstable or worse, criminals. Now the press had a real kook with which   
      to beat up law-abiding gun owners. Day after day, week after  week, the   
      media gave up all pretense of objectivity and demanded a  total ban on    
      all handguns. The Dunblane Inquiry, a few months  later, Sealed the fate  
      of the few sidearm still owned by private  citizens.           
      During  the years in which the British government incrementally took away 
      most gun rights, the notion that a citizen had the right to armed    
      self-defense came to be seen as vigilantism. Authorities refused  to grant gun 
      licenses to people who were threatened, claiming that self-defense was no longer considered
      a reason to own a gun.   Citizens who shot burglars or robbers or rapists were charged  while
      the real criminals were released.    Indeed,  after the Martin shooting, a police spokesman was 
      quoted as saying,  "We cannot have people take the law into their own hands."
      All  of Martin's neighbors had been robbed numerous times, and several    
      elderly people were severely injured in beatings by young thugs  who
      had no fear of the consequences. Martin himself, a collector  of
      antiques, had seen most of his collection trashed or stolen by  burglars.   
      When  the Dunblane Inquiry ended, citizens who owned handguns were given  
      three months to turn them over to local authorities. Being good British  
      subjects, most people obeyed the law. The few who didn't  were visited by 
      police and threatened with ten-year prison  sentences if they didn't  comply. 
      Police later bragged that they'd  taken nearly 200,000 handguns from private citizens.                                               
      How  did the authorities know who had handguns? The guns had been registered and licensed. 
      Kinda like cars.                               
      THIS IS WHY  OUR FOUNDING FATHERS PUT THE SECOND AMENDMENT IN OUR CONSTITUTION

    Difference Between http and https

    Thought this might be of some interest to you all.

     

    The Difference Between HTTP and HTTPS


    FIRST MANY PEOPLE ARE UNAWARE OF

    **The main difference between 
    http:// and https:// is It's all about

    keeping you secure**

    HTTP stands for HyperText Transport Protocol,

    which is just a fancy way of saying it's a protocol (a language, in 
    a manner of speaking)

    for information to be passed back and forth between web servers and 
    clients.
    The important thing is the letter S which makes the difference 
    between HTTP and HTTPS.

    The S (big surprise) stands for "Secure". 

    If you visit a website or webpage, and look at the address in the 
    web browser, it will likely begin with the following: 
    http://

    This means that the website is talking to your browser using the 
    regular 'unsecure' language. In other words, it is possible for someone to 
    "eavesdrop" on your computer's conversation with the website. If you fill
    out a form on the website, someone might see the information you send to 
    that site. 

    This is why you never ever enter your credit card number in an http 
    website!

    But if the web address begins with 
    https://, that basically means 
    your computer is talking to the website in a secure code that no one can 
    eavesdrop on. 

    You understand why this is so important, right?

    If a website ever asks you to enter your credit card information, 
    you should automatically look to see if the web address begins with 
    https://. If it doesn't, there's no way you're going to enter sensitive 
    information like a credit card number.

    March 26

    Help find Dead Ends

    Looking for Mary Kelly in county Galway, Ireland, b. abt 1843 +- 5 years, Arrived New Orleans in 1853 with Brother John on SS Hermana.

    Also looking for help finding Rebecca Lock and Jeremiah Treadaway Marriage documentation in Philadelphia PA/Northern New Jersey/early Massachussetts records.
    March 21

    Dell Dead End

    Need Help finding Marriage of Helena Midler b. 1904 in New Orleans to Lousia Dell and UNKNOWN Midler.
     
    Any help appreciated.
    March 08

    Blogs, twitter, facebook, plaxo

    For anyone interested, here are my current blogs and memberships:
     
     
    Twitter http://twitter.com/home  member cjtreadaway
     
    Facebook http://www.facebook.com/home.php   member Cliff Treadaway
     
    March 04

    Talking about Cliff's BLOG - LLTD PROTOCOL ISSUE RESOLVED

    I filed an incident report on Failure to load KB922120, install of LLTD Protocol in XP SP3 so my XP PC could recognize and communicate with my Vista 64 bit PC.
     
    I got a response from Bruce Liu (MS) [v-30bliu@mssupport.microsoft.com] for a hofix that is only available by request from microsoft help and support. 
     
     
    I was also sent a password that expires.  If you are having the same problem with you networked XP SP3 and VISTA PCs not recognizing each other, I suggest you contact Microsoft Help and Support to get a password for the HOTFIX at the above URL.
     
    Thank you,  FYI!
     
    Cliff
    March 01

    Windows Live Writer Toolbar Button

    I asked for a button on Windows Live Toolbar for Windows Live Writer.  This is the Ticket Number.
     
    Thank you for submitting your issue to Support.
    Your Support Ticket Number: 1095254266

    For reference, please print this page or write down your support ticket number. Use this number when communicating with Support about this issue.

    Will Post Response when I get one.

    Genealogy Updates

    Working on Rigaud Files.  Will finish connections today and post next week on Families of South Louisiana (MyFamily.com) site, and update Treadaway/Treadway (MyGreatBigFamily Site).

    You must be a member, or extended family member to access these sites.

    Email me for Passwords.

    Cliff

    Genealogy

    I need help translating an old French Document that is hard to read.
     
    Anyone offering help please contact me.